#Mount and blade khergit upgrade
#Mount and blade khergit full

They occupy a lot of land now, but it is quite sparsely populated and few new cities have been added. The Khergit have benefited from a large land expansion to the east, turning them into a major Empire and one of the biggest powers on the map. If you choose to wage war with the Khergits, the best thing you could do is recruit other Khergits and join Dustum Khan, saving some heavy infantry on the side to help with seiges. However, the Khergits lack of infantry and apparantly light armour compared to other factions means that they are nearly useless when beseiging. They are also fairly good at defending castles/towns. This means that the Khergits are great in open battle, particularly against the Swadians and, to a degree, everyone else. A lot of them are also archers, which means that they can take out other cavalry without getting hurt. The biggest advantage is that the entire troop tree is mounted, which means that Khergit troops can easily outrun and take out infantry. They are led by Sanjar Khan, and thier claimant is Dustum Khan. Their army is based entirely around cavalry, particularly Horse Archers, making them very powerful in open battle but weaker in sieges or forested terrain. Khergit lancer > everything other than swadian k-htДЄnd you have khergit lancer far more easily than you even have swadian man at arms, simply because of how easy it is to level up your troops when they're cavalry.The Khergit, based on the historical Mongols, occupy the east of the map from which they are said to have invaded. They're weaker in the latest of lategame than the other factions with heavy cavalry.

#Mount and blade khergit upgrade

The lack of 4th upgrade is the khergit's only weak point.

There is no 4th upgrade for khergit (except veteran horse archers, but those -s are weak as -, never got horse archer into veteran horse archer, they're useless compared to lancers) you've upgraded 3 times, but have the stats of a 4th upgrade, armored horses, lances, and sometimes they even carry bows. Horseman - not as important an upgrade, but boosts their damage and survivability quite a bit Skirmisher - first upgrade and already cav. Tribesman - best starting unit in game (bows, throwing spears, sometimes horses, still on par in melee)

they also double as ranged troops, while being good in melee. Tribesman - skirmisher - horseman - lancerДЈ upgrades, and you're at heavy cavalry, and skirmishers and horsemen are light cavalry, which outclass light infantry by far. Now on to my other point about the khergit.Д«ut they're the best at every other point in the game. Lance has its uses, but as you said 'unless you have the acrobatics' Yes, swadian k-hts are great, but before they're k-hts, you're better off being khergit, in every way.

#Mount and blade khergit full

nothing beats a khergit army untill you could have a full army of swadian k-hts.Д«ut swadian k-hts take longer to get, and are weaker up untill the point where they become k-hts. Khergit are not the most powerfull cavalry in the game, BUT they are the QUICKEST way to get as strong an army as possible.Д®arly game, khergit are unmatched. Having basically the same skills as a vaegir guard (4 power strike, 4 iron flesh, etc) but with better stats, while a vaegir guard has 8 strenght, a khergit lancer has 11. everything, and their level stats are on par or better than most melee infantry. they have heavy armor, armored horses, lances, swords, bows, shields. Khergit lancer - level 4 and they're already heavy cavalry. Khergit horseman - best level 3 troops in game Khergit skirmisher - level 2 and they're already cavalry Khergit tribesman - best recruit unit in the game, has throwing weapons, bows, and sometimes even horses Swadian man at arms - not as -, but still pretty bad But up untill the point where you get them, your troops are.